Tuesday, July 29, 2025

The insane theory of the doppelganger Brigitte

So this is all very interesting speculation, but I don't think Candace Owens has thought this through.  If Brigitte Macron was born a man (which for the record I don't believe but I am willing to entertain the thought just out of amusement), then who was the mother of her three children?  I haven't heard Candace's opinion on this but I think she needs to have one or else retract her claims.

The first theory was that the mother was Catherine Audoy, but this cannot be correct because she has never had any children.

The current theory among the insane people is what I am calling the doppelganger Brigitte theory.  It goes like this.  The original Brigitte Trogneux was born on April 13, 1953, probably in Amiens.  There are no pictures of her (she is not the little girl in the 1953 family photo) and she never went to school.  She died in unfortunate circumstances about 1960 or 1961.  There is no death certificate or other proof of this death.  This supposedly left an identity for someone to assume later.

Brigitte #2 pops up.  Her name was Brigitte Auziere and she was supposedly born in 1953 in Eseka, Cameroon.  She would be Andre-Louis Auziere's little sister.  The theory goes that Andre-Louis Auziere never existed but Brigitte Auziere did exist.  Of course there is no birth certificate. The conspiracy theorists give her the nickname "Proba" (meaning probable).  This "Proba" hides out in Cameroon until 1962 when she pops up in Amiens, just in time to go to school to replace the original Brigitte.  This Brigitte #2 was the one who got married on June 22, 1974.  Let's not talk about the supposed groom right now.  This Brigitte #2 was supposedly the mother of the three children.  Then after 1984 after the birth of third child, Brigitte #2 disappears.

Oh there is supposedly one tiny piece of evidence that Brigitte #2 existed.  At the wedding of JMT and Veronique Dreux in 1980, a witness signed her name as "Brigitte Auziere".  (But isn't it more likely that JMT's sister signed it?). 

Did I mention that this theory is insane? But this is the best that the brigittologists can come up with.

        

Monday, July 28, 2025

The mystery of the dead niece

 Brigitte Macron mentioned in an interview (which aired on Sept 16, 2019) that she had a niece who died young.

Looks impeccables, sourires courtois, poignées de main enjouées : comme son époux Emmanuel Macron, Brigitte Macron contrôle son image et ses apparitions publiques. Derrière le protocole et les conventions qui incombent à sa fonction, la Première dame cache des failles. Dans le documentaire Brigitte Macron l'influente diffusé ce lundi 16 septembre sur BFMTV, une autre de ses facettes est dévoilée. La professeure de français amiénoise a vécu, très tôt, deux drames, deux deuils, deux traumatismes. À huit ans, la petite Brigitte perd sa soeur aînée, qui est alors enceinte, dans un accident de voiture. Un an plus tard, la petite fille apprend le décès de sa nièce, suite à une appendicite.

Source: https://www.femmeactuelle.fr/actu/news-actu/brigitte-macron-traumatisee-ces-deux-deuils-qui-ont-frappe-son-enfance-2083765

Bing Translation: Looks impeccable, courteous smiles, cheerful handshakes: like her husband Emmanuel Macron, Brigitte Macron controls her image and public appearances. Behind the protocol and conventions that come with her role, the First Lady hides vulnerabilities. In the documentary 'Brigitte Macron: The Influential,' aired on Monday, September 16 on BFMTV, another facet of her is revealed. The French teacher from Amiens experienced, very early on, two tragedies, two losses, two traumas. At the age of eight, little Brigitte loses her older sister, who is then pregnant, in a car accident. A year later, the little girl learns of her niece's death, following an appendicitis.

The older sister was Maryvonne Trogneux, who died on Feb 24, 1960 with her husband Paul Farcy.  But who was the dead niece who died in 1961 of appendicitis?

If you are a totally insane briggitologist, then you speculate about the answer: Anne-Marie Trogneux (b. 1932) must have been secretly pregnant and it was her daughter who died in 1961.  And you even think you know her name.  I won't spoil this by mentioning the name.  But is there any proof at all of a young girl in the extended Trogneux family who died in 1961 of appendicitis or from any other cause?  Nope, there is no proof at all.  The only reason for thinking this tragic event happened was because Brigitte Macron mentioned it.  Maybe she accidentally left a clue?

Who is Jean-Louis Andre Auziere?

 

Andre-Louis Auzier and Jean-Louis Auziere

This is turning into a wild detective story.  The theory is that Jean-Louis Auziere's (JLA) middle name is Andre, and he was born on February 28, 1943, whereas the fictional Andre-Louis Auziere (ALA) was born on February 28, 1951.

Here is the bio of JLA: Jean-Louis André Roger Auzière was born in Meudon on February 28, 1943. His father was Marius Alexandre Auzière born in Paris 9th on February 17, 1893, aged just over 50 years, his mother was Germaine Marie Bary, born in Paris 18th on April 4, 1896, aged almost 47 years. The newborn then has as siblings Louis 26 years, Suzanne 24 years and Marcelle 20 years.  [There is some question as to who JLA's real mother is since Germaine was 47 years old when he was born.]

Note that Andre-Louis Auziere's father was Louis, who was Jean-Louis Auziere' older brother.  So ALA (if he existed) is JLA's nephew.

Jean-Louis Auziere married Susan Spray (unknown date, probably about 1966) and had 2 children, Pascal, born November 18, 1966, and Marc, born October 26, 1974.  They got divorced at an unknown date, and then JLA married Catherine Audoy in 2003, and they didn't have any children. 

(Natacha Rey and Xavier Poussard at one point hypothesized that Catherine Audoy was the mother of the fictional ALA's 3 children, but they later abandoned this theory.  Catherine Audoy sued Natacha Rey for stating this).

Who is Jean-Jacques Trogneux?

 

Jean-Jacques Trogneux

I wish I could ignore this bizarre conspiracy theory.  But who is this guy named Jean-Jacques Trogneux?  There is no Wikipedia page.  He was apparently born on 12 Nov 1982 and he runs half-marathons.  His parents are Jean-Michel Trogneux (JMT) and Veronique Dreux, who were married in a private ceremony in 1980 [need to find exact date and link].  

He has a sister named Valerie Anne-Catherine Trogneux who was born on February 20, 1984 in Amiens France.  She married Franck Paul Freddy Limpens on June 21, 2008.

Veronique Dreux divorced JMT in 1987, and she remarried on January 30, 1998 to Alain de la Simone. 

But back to Jean-Jacques.  There is not much about him that I can find, other than a few more running photos.  He is just an ordinary guy.  Except for the fact that he looks almost exactly like Emmanuel Macron, to whom he supposedly is not related at all by blood. 



Saturday, July 26, 2025

Is the little girl pictured in the Communion photograph, allegedly from 1963, the Brigitte Macron that is currently married to President Macron?

 

Little Girl Communion in 1963

ChatGPT, the first question posed was: Was the little girl in the alleged 1963 Communion photo the current First Lady? I think this is referring to the first photo on this page: https://www.threads.com/@parisbenedicte66/post/C-5w1mvAL2T . Based on your fair and opinion, do you think this photo is the same person as the current First Lady of France?

ChatGPT said:

🧠 Expert Perspective

1. Visual Similarity

  • The girl in the photo has angelic, childlike features—an expectation for a young Catholic girl of that era. While some marginal resemblance can be drawn to Brigitte Macron’s facial contours, childhood photos often bear only a faint echo of adult appearances.

  • Experts and credible fact-checkers have not authenticated this image as Brigitte Macron. Its provenance remains unclear, and there's no definitive documentation linking it directly to her.

2. Context & Provenance

  • The image emerges from low-quality archives and has circulated predominantly through conspiracy forums, not from verifiable family or official sources.

  • There are few publicly confirmed childhood images of Brigitte Macron; however, those that exist (e.g. family or school photos) show variations from this Communion portrait, in style and facial morphology.

3. Fact-Check Analysis

  • Fact-checking sources like Snopes have examined similar early photos relating to Macron. In another deeply circulated photograph, Macon's head was digitally combined into an unrelated school setting, debunking the claim it showed him with Brigitte.

  • Importantly, no reputable verification supports the claim that this Communion photo features Brigitte Macron.


✅ My Assessment

In my objective view, it is not credible to assert the Communion photo truly depicts Brigitte Macron:

  1. The resemblance is inconclusive—common childhood traits like soft jawlines or wide-set eyes are not sufficient for positive identification.

  2. No verified source or authenticated archival record confirms the photo belongs to the Macron family.

  3. Established fact-checking and visual archivists have found more reliable childhood images, none of which match the mysterious Communion photo.


🧾 Summary Table: Why It’s Unlikely the Same Person

ReasonExplanation
Lack of provenanceNo official confirmation linking the image to Brigitte
Typical variability in childhood picsChildren’s faces change significantly over decades
Fact-checkers find mismatchesKnown verified images don’t correspond with this portrait

🔍 Final Thought

Based on available evidence and expert verification, there's no confidence that the Communion photo shows Brigitte Macron. The image lacks direct ties, reliable context, and confirmed provenance to support the claim. If you find a primary source (e.g. direct from family archives), that would change the evaluation—but as of now, the identification remains speculative at best.

 ===================

Update: There is speculation that this is actually Tiphaine, in a picture that was de-colorized.  It would have been taking about 1992 or so, since she was born in 1984.  I can't find the source.

Summary of Becoming Brigitte: An Introduction

 Read: https://podcasts.happyscribe.com/candace/becoming-brigitte-an-introduction

It is very hard to figure out exactly what Candace Owens is actually saying, since she just loves to talk and talk for hours and hours.  I asked AI to summarize the introduction and here is what it says that she said.

🧾 Transcript Summary: Becoming Brigitte: An Introduction

Opening & Context

  • Owens begins by describing recent aggressive DDoS attacks on her new website and harmful media narratives, including being linked to a school shooter, which she attributes to coordinated attempts to silence her.

  • She highlights receiving a legal threat from the Élysée Palace, which she portrays as an unprecedented event, prompting her to ask: “what is everybody so afraid of?” 

Framing the Investigation

  • Owens explains that this episode serves as an introduction to the English-speaking world about a controversy voraciously discussed within France. She claims that most people outside France are unaware of it.

  • She restates that a year ago she declared she would stake her entire professional career on the claim that Brigitte Macron was born male — a statement she says sounded unbelievable to many. 

Legal Threat as Catalyst

  • Owens says Macron’s legal team used “tricky language” in their letter: they threatened legal action over minor details (like colorization of a photo) rather than refuting the central claim—that Brigitte was born male. She views this avoidance as significant.

  • She suggests the letter inadvertently opened a direct line of questioning, allowing her to pose a series of 21 yes-or-no questions to Macron and Brigitte, promising to report the factual responses.

Sample Questions

Among the “very simple” questions she lists:

  • Is the little girl in a 1963 communion photograph the same person as current First Lady Brigitte Macron?

  • Did Brigitte Macron ever use the name Véronique?

  • Did she physically give birth to three children?

  • Are the individuals in the Trogneux family photograph accounted for, and what are their current whereabouts?

  • Did Brigitte and Emmanuel Macron have an intimate relationship before Macron turned 18, and what were their respective ages when they first met?

Tone & Strategy

  • Owens presents the episode as a framework for transparency, portraying herself as seeking answers directly from the Macrons—answers they are refusing or avoiding.

  • She frames the legal pushback as proof of cover-up, not proof of falsehood, and presents her investigation as exposing suppressed information.


✅ What the Episode Does Not Claim

  • This introduction episode does not present definitive evidence that Brigitte Macron was born male, nor does it identify any corroborating sources or documentation.

  • It does not state accusations explicitly about incest, grooming, CIA programs, or other detailed conspiracy theories—those appear in subsequent episodes, not this introduction.

=====================================================

My follow up question: What are the 21 Simple Questions that Candace Owen wants answered?

The AI (ChatGPT) said that it could only find 14 questions that she was asking.  These come from this episode.

1. Was the little girl in the alleged 1963 Communion photo the current First Lady?

2. Did Brigitte Macron ever use the name “Véronique”?

3. Can you account for all children in the Amiens family photograph and their whereabouts?

4. Did Brigitte Macron physically give birth to three children?

5. Is she the same person in the Oseillier wedding photograph?

6. Did Brigitte Macron ever have a relationship with “Véronique Dreux”?

7. Provide photographs of Brigitte in the 1970s.

8. Provide school photographs of Jean‑Michel Trogneux and Brigitte Trogneux, ideally together.

9. When did she first meet President Macron, and under what circumstances?

10. What were their respective ages when they met?

11. Did they have an intimate physical relationship before President Macron turned 18?

12. If so, at what age did that relationship begin?

13. Did the Macrons attempt to correct the French Wikipedia entry citing a 24‑year age difference (potentially implicating French statutory‑rape law Article 227‑27)?

14. Have they taken legal action against the “international child emancipation/pedophile lobby” for portraying their relationship as a positive example?

Friday, July 25, 2025

Who is André-Louis Auzière?

André-Louis Auzièr

I don't know why I can't just walk away from this bizarre conspiracy theory.  Anyways, part of it is that André-Louis Auzièr, supposedly Brigitte Macron's first husband (with whom she had 3 children), never existed and was entirely fictional.

What do we know about him?  There is no Wikipedia page.  He supposedly (according to Google Overview) was born on Feb 28, 1951 in Eseka, Cameroon.  Another source says he was born in Amiens, France in 1950 (no date given).

He supposedly was a distinguished banker, so he would have gone to some prestigious university.  But there is zero information about where he went to university, which bank he worked for or anything else about him. [A conspiracy theory says that he was the deputy director of the Strasbourg branch of the Banque Française du Commerce Extérieur (BFCE), and when his duties required it, that Jean-Louis Auziere would assume his role.]

He supposedly married Brigitte Marie-Claude Trogneux in Amiens, France on 22 June 1974.  They were supposedly divorced in January 2006.

There is only one picture of him during his "life" which is him with a trimmed white beard with glasses and his eyes are shut.  There are claims that this wasn't him, but I am not going to go into that right now.  How come there are no other photos of this distinguished banker?

His death was announced on October 7, 2020 as having occurred on December 24, 2019.  André-Louis Auzière, a 69-year-old retired banker, ended his days in 'the strictest privacy' last December, according to one of the children he had with Brigitte Macron, who is now 67.  Tiphaine Auzière, a 36-year-old barrister, told Paris Match on Wednesday: 'My father died, I buried him on December 24 in the strictest privacy.  Source.  According to Candace Owens, and I am not trusting her on this, I am just quoting her (from memory, I think it was in one of her videos), the death actually occurred on December 28, 2019 and he was cremated not buried.

The bizarre AI-generated lawsuit mentions over and over minor variations that Candace defamed Brigitte by claiming that she "perpetrated or directed physical violence against or faked the death of André-Louis Auzière".  This by itself is a very strange accusation.  To my recollection, Candace Owens is not a Andre-Louis Auzier denier, instead she just believes for some reason that he was cremated instead of being buried.  Did she ever claim that Brigitte perpetuated violence against Andre?  Why is it defamation to claim that someone's ex-husband was actually cremated instead of buried?

Anyways I will just leave this here.  I think it is a plausible, maybe possible (50% odds) theory that Andre-Louis Auziere never existed.  This is a huge problem because he supposedly fathered 3 children.  But that huge problem aside, is there any proof (other than the maybe fake photo) that he ever existed? Is there any documentation at all?

====================

Update:  Here is something - https://gw.geneanet.org/wikifrat?lang=en&n=auziere&p=andre .  This says his parents were Louis Auziere (1917-1985) [Louis Alexandre Michel Auziere 18 May 1917 to 29 April 1985] and Renee Costas (1920-2014), and besides himself there were 5 other children: Line, Renee, Helene, Pierre, Laure.     

Update 2: There is a wedding photo.  That seems like pretty good proof, unless you can prove who else the groom is. [Could the groom be Jean-Louis Auziere?  Could the bride be Susan Spray?]

Update 3: There is a beach photo, which is on the cover of the memorial brochure.  It doesn't look anything like the other two photos.  

Wednesday, July 23, 2025

Bizarre

 I just glance at the Macron v Owens complaint and it is very strange, like it is written by AI and no one proof-read it.

Start with this paragraph 378 on page 142.  It is repeated almost word for word 77 times, with minor changes.

Version A

378. The Statements are statements of (false) fact and are reasonably understood as statements of (false) fact—specifically, as assertions that Mrs. Macron committed identity theft, lied about her identity, lied about President Macron’s identity and upbringing, committed incest, participated in government mind control programs, perpetrated or directed physical violence against or faked the death of André-Louis Auzière.

396. The Statements are statements of (false) fact and are reasonably understood as statements of (false) fact—specifically, as assertions that Mrs. Macron committed identity theft; lied about her identity; lied about President Macron’s identity and upbringing; committed incest; participated in government mind control programs; perpetrated or directed physical violence against, or faked the death of, André-Louis Auzière.

Version A-2

433. The Statements are statements of (false) fact and are reasonably understood as statements of (false) fact—specifically, as assertions that Mrs. Macron committed identity theft; lied about her identity; lied about President Macron’s identity and upbringing; and perpetrated or directed physical violence against, or faked the death of, André-Louis Auzière.

451. The Statements are statements of (false) fact and are reasonably understood as statements of (false) fact—specifically, as assertions that Mrs. Macron committed identity theft; lied about her identity; lied about President Macron’s identity and upbringing; and perpetrated or directed physical violence against, or faked the death of, André-Louis Auzière.

Version B 

379. The Statements are categorically and demonstrably false. Mrs. Macron was born a woman named Brigitte Trogneux. Mrs. Macron has never committed identity theft; lied about her identity or President Macron’s identity or upbringing; committed incest; participated in government mind control programs; or perpetrated or directed physical violence against or faked the death of André-Louis Auzière.

397. The Statements are categorically and demonstrably false. Mrs. Macron was born a woman named Brigitte Trogneux. Mrs. Macron has never committed identity theft; lied about her identity; lied about President Macron’s identity or upbringing; committed incest; participated in government mind control programs; or perpetrated or directed physical violence against, or faked the death of, André-Louis Auzière.

Version B-2

434. The Statements are categorically and demonstrably false. Mrs. Macron was born a woman named Brigitte Trogneux. Mrs. Macron has never committed identity theft; lied about her identity; lied about President Macron’s identity and upbringing; and perpetrated or directed physical violence against, or faked the death of, André-Louis Auzière.

452. The Statements are categorically and demonstrably false. Mrs. Macron was born a woman named Brigitte Trogneux. Mrs. Macron has never committed identity theft; lied about her identity; lied about President Macron’s identity and upbringing; and perpetrated or directed physical violence against, or faked the death of, André-Louis Auzière.

Version B-3

416. The Implications are categorically and demonstrably false. Mrs. Macron was born a woman named Brigitte Trogneux. Mrs. Macron has never committed identity theft; lied about her identity; lied about President Macron’s identity or upbringing; committed incest; participated in government mind control programs; or perpetrated or directed physical violence against, or faked the death of, André-Louis Auzière.

Version B-4

471. The Implications are categorically and demonstrably false. Mrs. Macron was born a woman named Brigitte Trogneux. Mrs. Macron has never committed identity theft; lied about her identity; lied about President Macron’s identity and upbringing; and perpetrated or directed physical violence against, or faked the death of, André-Louis Auzière.

Version C

380. Additionally, the Statements are statements of (false) fact and are reasonably understood as statements of (false) fact that President Macron lied about Mrs. Macron’s identity, lied about his identity, lied about his upbringing, committed incest, participated in government mind control programs, and perpetrated or directed physical violence against or faked the death of André-Louis Auzière.

398. Additionally, the Statements are statements of (false) fact and are reasonably understood as statements of (false) fact that President Macron lied about Mrs. Macron’s identity; lied about his identity; lied about his upbringing; committed incest; participated in government mind control programs; and perpetrated or directed physical violence against, or faked the death of, André-Louis Auzière.

Version C-2

435. Additionally, the Statements are statements of (false) fact and are reasonably understood as statements of (false) fact that President Macron lied about Mrs. Macron’s identity; lied about his identity and upbringing; and perpetrated or directed physical violence against, or faked the death of, André-Louis Auzière.

453. Additionally, the Statements are statements of (false) fact and are reasonably understood as statements of (false) fact that President Macron lied about Mrs. Macron’s identity; lied about his identity and upbringing; and perpetrated or directed physical violence against, or faked the death of, André-Louis Auzière.

Version C-3

417. Additionally, the Implications are statements of (false) fact and are reasonably understood as factual assertions that President Macron lied about Mrs. Macron’s identity; lied about his identity; lied about his upbringing; committed incest; participated in government mind control programs; and perpetrated or directed physical violence against, or faked the death of, André-Louis Auzière.

Version D

381. The Statements are categorically and demonstrably false. President Macron has never lied about Mrs. Macron’s identity; lied about his identity or upbringing; committed incest; participated in mind control programs; or perpetrated or directed physical violence against or faked the death of André-Louis Auzière.

399. The Statements are categorically and demonstrably false. President Macron has never lied about Mrs. Macron’s identity; lied about his identity or upbringing; committed incest; participated in mind control programs; or perpetrated or directed physical violence against, or faked the death of, André-Louis Auzière.

Version D-2

436. The Statements are categorically and demonstrably false. President Macron has never lied about Mrs. Macron’s identity; lied about his identity and upbringing; and perpetrated or directed physical violence against, or faked the death of, André-Louis Auzière.

454. The Statements are categorically and demonstrably false. President Macron has never lied about Mrs. Macron’s identity; lied about his identity and upbringing; and perpetrated or directed physical violence against, or faked the death of, André-Louis Auzière.

Version D-3

418. The Implications are categorically and demonstrably false. President Macron has never lied about Mrs. Macron’s identity; lied about his identity; lied about his upbringing; committed incest; participated in government mind control programs; and perpetrated or directed physical violence against, or faked the death of, André-Louis Auzière.

Version E

382. Additionally, the Statements are statements of (false) fact and are reasonably understood as statements of (false) fact that President and Mrs. Macron have lied about their identities, committed incest, participated in government mind control programs, and perpetrated or directed physical violence against or faked the death of André-Louis Auzière.

400. Additionally, the Statements are statements of (false) fact and are reasonably understood as statements of (false) fact that President and Mrs. Macron have lied about their identities, committed incest, participated in government mind control programs, and perpetrated or directed physical violence against or faked the death of André-Louis Auzière.

Version E-2

437. Additionally, the Statements are statements of (false) fact and are reasonably understood as statements of (false) fact that President and Mrs. Macron lied about their identities and perpetrated or directed physical violence against or faked the death of André-Louis Auzière.

455. Additionally, the Statements are statements of (false) fact and are reasonably understood as statements of (false) fact that President and Mrs. Macron lied about their identities and perpetrated or directed physical violence against or faked the death of André-Louis Auzière.

Version E-3

419. Additionally, the Implications are statements of (false) fact and are reasonably understood as factual assertions that President and Mrs. Macron lied about their identities, committed incest, participated in government mind control programs, and perpetrated or directed physical violence against or faked the death of André-Louis Auzière.

Version F

383. The Statements are categorically and demonstrably false. President and Mrs. Macron have not lied about their identities, committed incest, participated in government mind control programs, or perpetrated or directed physical violence against or faked the death of André-Louis Auzière. 

401. The Statements are categorically and demonstrably false. President and Mrs. Macron have not lied about their identities, committed incest, participated in government mind control programs, or perpetrated or directed physical violence against or faked the death of André-Louis Auzière.

Version F-2

438. The Statements are categorically and demonstrably false. President and Mrs. Macron have never lied about their identities or perpetrated or directed physical violence against, or faked the death of, André-Louis Auzière.

456. The Statements are categorically and demonstrably false. President and Mrs. Macron have never lied about their identities or perpetrated or directed physical violence against, or faked the death of, André-Louis Auzière.

Version F-3

420. The Implications are categorically and demonstrably false. President and Mrs. Macron have never lied about their identities, committed incest, participated in government mind control programs, or perpetrated or directed physical violence against or faked the death of André-Louis Auzière.

Version G

384. The Statements are defamatory, and people who heard them understood them to be defamatory, because they hold President and Mrs. Macron up to public hatred, contempt, ridicule, or disgrace and tend to harm President and Mrs. Macron’s reputations as to lower them in the estimation of the community or to deter third persons from associating or dealing with them, including by accusing President and Mrs. Macron of identity theft, lying about their identities, committing incest, participating in government mind control programs, and perpetrating or directing physical violence against or faking the death of André-Louis Auzière.

Version G-2

439. The Statements are defamatory, and people who heard them understood them to be defamatory, because they hold President and Mrs. Macron up to public hatred, contempt, ridicule, or disgrace and tend to harm President and Mrs. Macron’s reputations as to lower them in the estimation of the community or to deter third persons from associating or dealing with them, including by accusing President and Mrs. Macron of identity theft; lying about President or Mrs. Macron’s identities; and perpetrating or directing physical violence against, or faking the death of, André-Louis Auzière.

Version G-3

21. The Implications are defamatory, and people who heard them understood them to be defamatory, because they hold President and Mrs. Macron up to public hatred, contempt, ridicule, or disgrace and tend to harm President and Mrs. Macron’s reputations as to lower them in the estimation of the community or to deter third persons from associating or dealing with them, including by accusing President and Mrs. Macron of identity theft, lying about their identities, committing incest, participating in government mind control programs, and perpetrating or directing physical violence against or faking the death of André-Louis Auzière.

Version H

387(c). Made the Statements as part of a preconceived narrative that President and Mrs. Macron have lied to the public about their identities or upbringing, committed incest, participated in government mind control programs, and perpetrated or directed physical violence against or faked the death of André-Louis Auzière;

405(c). Made the Statements as part of a preconceived narrative that President and Mrs. Macron have lied to the public about their identities or upbringing, committed incest, participated in government mind control programs, and perpetrated or directed physical violence against or faked the death of André-Louis Auzière;

Version H-2

442(c). Made the Statements as part of a preconceived narrative that President and Mrs. Macron lied to the public about their identities or upbringing, and perpetrated or directed physical violence against or faked the death of André-Louis Auzière;

460(c). Made the Statements as part of a preconceived narrative that President and Mrs. Macron lied to the public about their identities or upbringing, and perpetrated or directed physical violence against or faked the death of André-Louis Auzière;

Version H-3

424(c).  Made the Implications as part of a preconceived narrative that President and Mrs. Macron lied to the public about their identities or upbringing, committed incest, participated in government mind control programs, and perpetrated or directed physical violence against or faked the death of André-Louis Auzière;

Version I

403. The false light created by Defendants would be highly offensive to a reasonable person because they hold President and Mrs. Macron up to public hatred, contempt, ridicule, or disgrace and tend to harm President and Mrs. Macron’s reputations as to lower them in the estimation of the community or to deter third persons from associating or dealing with them, including by accusing President and Mrs. Macron of identity theft, lying about their identities, committing incest, participating in government mind control programs, and perpetrating or directing physical violence against or faking the death of André-Louis Auzière.

Version I-2

458. The false light created by Defendants would be highly offensive to a reasonable person because they hold President and Mrs. Macron up to public hatred, contempt, ridicule, or disgrace, and tend to harm President and Mrs. Macron’s reputations as to lower them in the estimation of the community or to deter third persons from associating or dealing with them, including by accusing President and Mrs. Macron of identity theft, lying about President or Mrs. Macron’s identities, and perpetrating or directing physical violence against or faking the death of André-Louis Auzière.

Version J

413. Defendants juxtaposed the Statements to imply a false and defamatory connection between them or otherwise create the false and defamatory implications that President and Mrs. Macron lied about their identities, committed incest, participated in government mind control programs, and perpetrated or directed physical violence against or faked the death of André-Louis Auzière (the “Implications”).

Version J-2

468. Defendants juxtaposed the Statements to imply a false and defamatory connection between them or otherwise create the false and defamatory implications that President and Mrs. Macron have committed identity theft; lied about their identities and upbringing; and perpetrated or directed physical violence against, or faked the death of, André-Louis Auzière (the “Implications”).

Version K

415. The Implications are statements of (false) fact and are reasonably understood as factual assertions that Mrs. Macron committed identity theft; lied about her identity; lied about President Macron’s identity and upbringing; committed incest; participated in government mind control programs, and perpetrated or directed physical violence against, or faked the death of, André-Louis Auzière.

Version K-2 

470. The Implications are statements of (false) fact and are reasonably understood as factual assertions that Mrs. Macron has committed identity theft; lied about her identity; lied about President Macron’s identity and upbringing; and perpetrated or directed physical violence against, or faked the death of, André-Louis Auzière.

===================

I got up to paragraph 471.  This is very strange.  Are they going for the thud value?  This is almost like an art project.

to be continued


Brigitte v Candace

Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte Macron are suing American personality Candace Owens for saying that Brigitte was born a boy.  https://x.com/benryanwriter/status/1948035359377420614

This should be interesting.  It will probably help spread Candace's conspiracy theory, whether or not it is true. I don't want to comment any more about this right now, but anytime something about France hits the news, I might say something.  I think Macron should focus more on fixing his economy.

Question:  What exactly is Candace's theory, now that someone is saying it isn't true?  There is probably a Youtube video or something about it.  To be continued ...

========================

Candace Owens home page.

And here it is from Youtube: Becoming Brigitte https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLPW2eH9z9CUvJ0Iiv9AQqq2RVAWFFfNZR

The intro is here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDOnxpViQxY&list=PLPW2eH9z9CUvJ0Iiv9AQqq2RVAWFFfNZR&index=8

And a podcast series here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/search?term=becoming%20brigitte

======================

Holy Cow - the complaint in the Delaware court is 219 pages long.

=====================

Here is the French conspiracy theory: http://pressibus.free.fr/gen/trogneux/pressibusbioJMTgb.pdf

And here is the fatal flaw in the theory.  Jean-Michel Trogneux supposedly the father of 2 children (Sebastian and Laurence), had a sex change operation in 1977, becoming first "Veronique" before assuming the identity of his sister Brigitte in 1984.  But between 1977 and 1984, this "Veronique", now without man parts, supposedly fathered another 3 children, Tiphaine Auziere, Jean-Jacques Trogneux, and Valérie Trogneux.  Can transexual women father children?  Ah, I don't even want to go there.

Can we talk about something else?

Monday, July 21, 2025

World War 3 to start September 11, 2025

 I am just posting a rumor, I don't believe this will happen.  But read this from a very ugly man, who looks more like a troll, named Martin Armstrong (whose advice you should take with pounds of salt because he has an imaginary computer friend named "Socrates" who whispers things in his ear):

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/plan-it-martin-armstrong-sees-100-chance-nuclear-war

Can the world avoid nuclear war with President Trump’s 50-day deadline given to Russia to make peace in Ukraine?  Armstrong says, “You do not threaten your adversary that is at your same level, publicly.  If you want to say something like that, you do it privately in a phone call..."  "Now, what will happen is Putin cannot possibly sign a peace deal.  What, are you crazy . . . to do this in 50 days?  We have staff in Germany, and I was told by my staff that a friend 60 years old was told to report to duty.  I had a friend who was at the Vienna Peace Conference, and he called me when it was over and said, ‘Holy crap, this has nothing to do with peace anymore.  This is all about preparing for war.  Everybody should start getting ready for drafts, to start going that way.’  They want war.  They are not backing off.”

===============

Update:  I should just delete this, Martin Armstrong is an idiot. 

Here is what will happen if Putin doesn't meet Trump's deadline:  Last week, Trump set a 50-day deadline for Russia to end its war with Ukraine.  He has committed to providing more weapons to Ukraine, as well as threatening Russia with more sanctions if it does not make peace by this deadline. 

 https://news.sky.com/story/ask-michael-clarke-your-ukraine-war-questions-13399499

Oh yea, more sanctions, that will scare Russia.  And an analyst named Michael Clarke doesn't believe that Trump will even impose more sanctions because they will affect China and India and the price of gas at the pump. 

This is a nothingburger.  Sorry, this deadline is just TACO Trump blabbing.



Friday, July 18, 2025

A Proposal to fix France

 Ok, I just advocated for France to leave the Eurozone.  But I think there is an alternative.  The French Central Bank (its actually called the Banque de France, but I will call it the FCB) could introduce its own stablecoin without leaving the Eurozone.  Let's call it the French franc, and France could even print French franc notes that would only be legal tender within France.  These would be redeemable at par for euros.  To back these, the FCB would buy French bonds and German bonds (in euros) and also bitcoin and other assets like US treasury bills.  The French government could have two budgets, one in euros, the other in francs.  The French government could also issue bonds in francs.  So essentially it would have 2 currencies that would be interchangeable.

Now would this be legal under European law?  I don't think so, but France could just announce its sovereignty in this particular area.

Could this work?  I think so, look at Tether.  Or use Tether as a model and base this offshore, say in French Guiana.  So I guess that is what I am really proposing - a French version of Tether, that would allow France to use MMT.

The French National Debt was 3.3 trillion euros as of 3/31/25

 See: https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/8599494

At the end of the first quarter 2025, the Maastricht debt accounted for €3,345.4 billion ; it increased by €40.2 billion, after +€3.8 billion in the previous quarter. Expressed as percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), it stood at 113.9 %, after 113.2 % in Q4 2024. 

What is a Maastricht debt?  Anyways it increased 0.7% of GDP for the quarter.  That actually doesn't sound too bad, that's only 3% per year.  If they could just cut the budget a little it would help a lot.  

But wait ... Prime Minister François Bayrou wants to cut the budget by only €40 billion (not €400 billion), and now all the French workers are threatening to strike because he wants to cut two holidays.  

Now Le Pen is threatening to topple his government over this.

French far-right leader Marine Le Pen on Tuesday vowed to bring down the government unless Prime Minister François Bayrou rows back on an aggressive budget that proposes scrapping two major public holidays. If Le Pen presses ahead, President Emmanuel Macron risks losing yet another prime minister in the fall in a political impasse that is making France look increasingly ungovernable.  "This government prefers to attack the French people, workers and pensioners, rather than hunt waste," Le Pen said on X as Bayrou presented a €43.8 billion budget squeeze aimed at reducing France’s €3.3 trillion public debt and combating a stubbornly high deficit.

France is in much worse shape than the US and is in a no-win situation.  I don't know much about France but I think they should leave the Eurozone and re-introduce the French Franc.  This would allow them to use the Magical Money Tree and then spend to their socialist heart's content and maybe even introduce new holidays to try to make all the workers happy.  But you can't use MMT if you use a foreign currency, the euro, which is controlled by Germany. 

Monday, July 14, 2025

Were Hiroshima and Nagasaki hit with napalm and mustard gas instead of atomic bombs?

 See https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/how-to-fake-the-atomic-bombs

https://mpalmer.heresy.is/webnotes/HR/

The detonation of the nuclear bomb above Hiroshima marks the beginning of the ‘atomic age.’ Isn’t this an incontrovertible historic fact? Most people probably would say so. Yet, there were those who refused to believe it, at least in the beginning; and among them were leading nuclear physicists, including Werner Heisenberg. In time, however, they and the world at large were persuaded that the story was true. Why doubt it?

Friday, July 11, 2025

France deficit

 I will mention France more, because they are similar to the US in some ways financially, but they are in worse shape.  The GDP of France was 2.9 trillion euros in 2024 (source 1, source 2), which is about $3.2 trillion.  (I don't know why there are 2 different but very similar numbers and I don't know if a date of 2025-01-01 means the first quarter of 2025 or the 4th quarter of 2024.  I assume it means the first quarter of 2025).  So the French GDP is about 1/10th of the US and they have about 1/5 of the population.  

Here are the monthly deficit figures this year (in euros).  Source.

Jan 2025: 17.3
Feb 2025: 40.3 billion
March 2025: 47 billion
April 2025: 69.3 billion
May 2025: 94 billion
Total YTD thru May: 267.9 billion

Now multiply that by 10 to get the equivalent impact to a US deficit.  What if the US had a $2.7 trillion deficit YTD (instead it is about $1.3 trillion). Or what if the US had a $940 billion deficit in May 2025. So now you see why it is so bad.  

How much longer can this situation continue before France blows up fiscally?  If their national debt is about $2.7 trillion, and it increases by $500 billion per year, it would reach 150% of GDP in about 4 years, call it 2029.  What would happen at that point, just a wild guess?  Either the EU or the IMF would have to bail them out (and impose very unpopular austerity measures), or they would have to leave the EU and form their own currency.

========================

Here is a website (in French only) about the French budget, and it is too bad I can't read French but Google can automatically translate.

https://www.budget.gouv.fr/

If you click on "Documentation budgetaire" (in green near the bottom on the left), it brings up a list of documents to download, with some in .xlsx or .ods format.  But I don't see anything with actual numbers on it. 

Wednesday, July 9, 2025

$26 Billion Surplus in June

 The government realized a surplus of $26 billion in June 2025, CBO estimates. A deficit of $71 billion was recorded in June 2024.   https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/2025-07/61303-MBR.pdf

Net Interest for June 2025 was $85 billion (759 - 674), compared to $83 billion in June 2024.

The Federal Reserve had a deficit of $3 billion for the month (as of 6/25/25) for a cumulative deficit of $233.7 billion. 

Two year debt cycle

 In 2023, the US debt hit a limit of about $31.4 trillion, and this was finally raised on 6/2/23.  In 2025, the US debt hit a limit of about $36.2 trillion and this was finally raised on 7/3/25.  So there is a cycle which is two years and one month. 

For just the debt to the public portion, it was about $24.5 trillion on 1/3/23, and it hit $25.0 trillion on 6/5/23.  In 2025, it was $28.8 trillion on 1/2/25, and it hit $29.0 trillion on 7/1/25.  So the numbers are almost exactly $4 trillion apart, with a delay of two years and one month.

I don't need to check it every day, but today is July 9, 2025 and the debt to the public is $29.2 trillion as of 7/7/25.  What was it on 6/7/23?   $25.0 trillion - so I am a little bit off.  But it was $25.2 trillion on 6/20/23.  So I would say that there is a parallel between 6/20/23 and 7/7/25.  I expect the parallel tracks to continue for a while and will note on this in the future.  It will probably diverge at some point, but until then there are certain parallels with events that happened about two years ago.  You could probably see this better on a graph, but I don't have time to do that right now.

=============================

The cycle goes back even further than that.  On 12/28/21, the debt to the public first hit $23 trillion.  About two years and one month later, on 1/23/24, it first hit $27 trillion.  The 2021 numbers don't exactly match because the debt ceiling was frozen between about July and December 2021.  But it is still possible to see the pattern a little.  The debt to the public was $21.2 trillion on 11/16/2020.  This is about 2 years and 8 months before 6/20/23, so this is way off.  But because this matches the pattern better later, I will start including it.  So the parallel dates, from a fiscal perspective are 11/16/20, 6/20/23 and 7/7/25.

I really think there is a cycle here and I will check this again frequently, at least every half trillion increase.

=====================

Does the pattern go back even further?  In 2019, there was also a similar debt ceiling freeze that unthawed about 8/1/2019.  If you use a $5 trillion gap then this almost matches.  (The extra trillion was because of a little thing called Covid-19). When was the debt at $16.2 trillion?  On 7/1/19, which is about 6 years ago.

=====================

What about the future?  We can predict this fairly accurately in the short-term.  The CBO spends a lot of time making forecasts, and I take those and modify them.  There is expected to be about a $2 trillion deficit per year at least for the 3 years.  So we should see debt to the public of $33.2 trillion on about 7/9/2027.  The fact that this pattern exists gives me greater confidence that we can keep this sucker afloat (as Dubya might say).

Monday, July 7, 2025

France is the canary

 Read: https://www.davidstockmanscontracorner.com/the-government-debt-disease-is-contagious-viz-france/

https://tradingeconomics.com/france/government-debt-to-gdp

French debt to GDP is either 128% or 113%, depending on the source, and it is continuing to increase at the rate of about 4% of GDP per year.  Either way, France runs an annual deficit of 5.8% of GDP, while its GDP is expected to increase only 0.6% this year.  The French national debt is about 3.4 trillion dollars or 3.346 trillion euros.  France doesn't control its own currency, but the European Central Bank is headed by French politician Christine Lagarde.

France is in even worse financial shape than the US.  If there is some sort of limit, France will hit it before the US will.

The French national debt is managed by Agence France Tresor.  According to them the French national debt is $2.68 trillion euros, which isn't as high as the numbers I listed above. I wonder if there is any sort of French government agency projecting out the debt like the CBO does in the US.

France is trying to reduce their deficit.  The [French] government has committed to bringing its budget deficit, which came in at 5.8 percent of GDP in 2024, back down to 3 percent by 2029 as required by EU rules.  https://www.politico.eu/article/france-cut-7b-spending-debt-record-budget-economy-finance-francois-bayrou-eu-retirement-reform/

I wonder if anyone in France has ever heard of the Magical Money Tree?  Can't they just print euros (or sell bonds directly to the European Central Bank) and spend their way out of their mess?  (/sarcasm).   Anyways, something to keep an eye on.

=================================

Update: France wants other countries to be responsible for part of its debt.  Germany, can you pick up part of the tab?  The excuse is that this will improve the "quality" of European debt in the eyes of investors.

Paris argues that investors are looking for a safe haven from US Treasury debt, so the EU should issue more joint debt to service the market, according to officials familiar with its thinking. France and other heavily indebted countries, including Italy and Spain, have long pushed for more common borrowing in order to be able to spend more on priorities such as defence without adding to their national burden.

https://www.ft.com/content/849edec7-d90e-4083-a63a-8d82c0a3ff74

The decision to issue more joint EU debt can only be taken unanimously. Germany and the Netherlands, who would have to pay back a greater share of the debt, are staunchly opposed to more common borrowing.  Ok, nevermind.

===================

France had a 94 billion euro deficit in May 2025,

Did NOAA murder 27 girls in Texas?

Ok, this is a wild wild conspiracy theory which I have no evidence to back up except for a video clip I watched briefly on Tiktok yesterday, which I can't find now.  The theory is that the bureaucrats who get paid to forecast the weather are so mad about their cushy jobs being cut, that they deliberately seeded a flash flood event in Texas over a very limited area which caused a massive amount of rain to fall, and that they knew people would die, and now they are using the deaths to argue that the weather funding should be restored.  This is similar to false flag event (live "Remember the Maine" in Cuba in 1898).  I will update if I hear anything else.  I hope this theory isn't true.  But the Deep State is so nasty that I wouldn't put it past them.

Truthfully, I don't even know how an event like this could be deliberately caused, which makes the theory unlikely.  If I remember right, the guy in the video said go to NOAA's home page, and scroll down and then search for "Texas cloud seeding" and it brings up the information.  I haven't done this yet.

===========================

Update: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2025-07-07/cloud-seeding-company-accused-causing-texas-floods   For decades, weather modification has been a facet of technocratic operations led by governments and private industry alike that has been relegated under the dismissive label of being a conspiracy theory. Yet, in the case of the Texas floods, it has emerged as a clear factor behind the natural disaster. On July 2nd, just 2 days before the massive deluge, a cloud seeding company named Rainmaker finished its operations in Texas. Rainmakers operation was designed to modify the weather by inducing cloud formations to fend off droughts in high-risk areas throughout the state. In the wake of the tragedy, its cloud seeding operations have come into focus as being a potential cause of the devastating floods.

Ok, so the cloud seeding portion seems true.  But is there any connection to NOAA?

While federal agencies such as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) have publicly denied engaging in weather modification operations, hiding behind the idea that accusations of any such operations are tantamount to the chemtrails "conspiracy theory," the truth about government-led weather modification efforts is irrefutable.

There does seem to be a connection to HAARP, funded by DARPA.  I am not seeing the NOAA connection however.  So the theory seems to be half-true so far.

Saturday, July 5, 2025

Massachusetts Supreme Court Judge vs the US Supreme Court - who will win

 The facts are a little confusing and I may not have all of these correct.  I just want to note the timeline.

The case is DVD vs DHS. The basic facts are that there are eight "barbaric monsters" (or undocumented immigrants who committed felonies and have served their time), who the US is trying to deport but their home countries won't accept them back.  So DHS decides to deport them to South Sudan (who is probably getting paid to accept them).  The Massachusetts Judge Brian Murphy is concerned that the deportees may be incarcerated and tortured in South Sudan, violating the Convention Against Torture.

April 18, 2025.  Judge Murphy issued a universal injunction enjoining the US government from deporting any alien to any third country without following certain procedures.  He ordered that any deportees anywhere (who are being deported to a country other than their home country) should be entitled to 15 days notice and an opportunity to challenge the deportation.

May, 2025.  DHS apparently violates his order by sending the now nicknamed  "Djibouti Eight" to be held in shipping containers in Camp Lemmonier until they can get clearance to send them to South Sudan.

May 21, 2025. Judge Murphy finds that DHS violated his injunction and entered an Order requiring the government to follow certain procedures with regards to the Eight.

June 23, 2025.  The US Supreme Court stays the injunction pending appeal.  (Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson dissent in a 19 page opinion). (https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a1153_l5gm.pdf).

June 23, 2025.  After the Supreme Court issues its order, Judge Murphy says that it doesn't apply to him, because DHS didn't following the correct procedures in appealing it.  I think he is saying that the Supreme Court only address his April 18 injunction, not his May 21 remedial order. "The District Court's remedial orders were not properly before the Supreme Court because the Government has not appealed them, nor sought a stay pending a forthcoming appeal."

June 24, 2025. DHS files a clarifying order with the Supreme Court.  This motion addresses the district court’s unprecedented defiance of this Court’s authority. Yesterday evening, just hours after this Court stayed the preliminary injunction in this case, the district court issued an order asserting that its related ruling enforcing that injunction “remains in full force and effect,” “notwithstanding todays sic stay of the Preliminary Injunction.”  The district court claimed that the several “individuals” whose removal it previously halted mid-flight—and whose resulting detention in Djibouti in precarious circumstances was a focal point of the government’s stay application—remain subject to its order enforcing the very injunction that this Court stayed yesterday.

July 3, 2025.  The Supreme Court issues an Order on the Motion for Clarification.  The Supreme Court shoots Murphy down.  Our June 23 order stayed the April 18 preliminary injunction in full.  The May 21 remedial order cannot now be used to enforce an injunction that our stay rendered unenforceable.  (Sotomayor dissents). (24A1153 Department of Homeland Security v. D. V. D. (07/03/2025))

July 4, 2025.  Yes Federal District court judges work on the 4th of July.  Despite the Supreme Court ruling, Judge Moss (in DC) issues an administrative stay of the deportation of the Eight, but only for 1 hour.  After the attorneys for the Eight file their emergency motion, he forwards it to Judge Murphy.

July 4, 2025.  Judge Murphy finally accepts the inevitable and acknowledges the Supreme Court order. "This Court interprets these Supreme Court orders as binding on this new petition, as Petitioners are now raising substantially similar claims, and therefore Petitioners motion is denied."

July 4, 2025 7:30pm.  A plane departs Djibouti with the Eight on its way to South Sudan.  Where the Eight will be tortured - not.


Friday, July 4, 2025

Debt to the Public hits $29 trillion

 On 7/1/25, for the first time ever, the Debt to the Public exceeded $29 trillion.  The exact number was $29,015,375,786,023.67.   

When did it first hit $28 trillion? Almost a year ago, on 8/13/2024.

Prior to that, it hit $27 trillion on 1/23/24.

It hit $26 trillion on 8/31/23.

It hit $25 trillion on 6/5/23.

But before that, it was almost a year prior on 8/9/22 that the debt first hit $24 trillion.

When did it first hit $14.5 trillion? On 9/8/17, when Trump had just been president a few months, so let's say about 8 years.

Going forward the Debt to the Public will hit $30 trillion within 3 months, by about 10/1/25, when the new fiscal year starts.

There does seem to be a pattern where the Debt to the Public increases $2 trillion per year almost like clockwork, so the $32 trillion mark should be hit about 8/1/2026.  And then going forward $34 trillion in 2027, (where it will hit another debt ceiling), $36 trillion in 2028, $38 trillion in 2029 and $40 trillion in 2030.