Read: https://podcasts.happyscribe.com/candace/becoming-brigitte-an-introduction
It is very hard to figure out exactly what Candace Owens is actually saying, since she just loves to talk and talk for hours and hours. I asked AI to summarize the introduction and here is what it says that she said.
🧾 Transcript Summary: Becoming Brigitte: An Introduction
Opening & Context
-
Owens begins by describing recent aggressive DDoS attacks on her new website and harmful media narratives, including being linked to a school shooter, which she attributes to coordinated attempts to silence her.
-
She highlights receiving a legal threat from the Élysée Palace, which she portrays as an unprecedented event, prompting her to ask: “what is everybody so afraid of?”
Framing the Investigation
-
Owens explains that this episode serves as an introduction to the English-speaking world about a controversy voraciously discussed within France. She claims that most people outside France are unaware of it.
-
She restates that a year ago she declared she would stake her entire professional career on the claim that Brigitte Macron was born male — a statement she says sounded unbelievable to many.
Legal Threat as Catalyst
-
Owens says Macron’s legal team used “tricky language” in their letter: they threatened legal action over minor details (like colorization of a photo) rather than refuting the central claim—that Brigitte was born male. She views this avoidance as significant.
-
She suggests the letter inadvertently opened a direct line of questioning, allowing her to pose a series of 21 yes-or-no questions to Macron and Brigitte, promising to report the factual responses.
Sample Questions
Among the “very simple” questions she lists:
-
Is the little girl in a 1963 communion photograph the same person as current First Lady Brigitte Macron?
-
Did Brigitte Macron ever use the name Véronique?
-
Did she physically give birth to three children?
-
Are the individuals in the Trogneux family photograph accounted for, and what are their current whereabouts?
-
Did Brigitte and Emmanuel Macron have an intimate relationship before Macron turned 18, and what were their respective ages when they first met?
Tone & Strategy
-
Owens presents the episode as a framework for transparency, portraying herself as seeking answers directly from the Macrons—answers they are refusing or avoiding.
-
She frames the legal pushback as proof of cover-up, not proof of falsehood, and presents her investigation as exposing suppressed information.
✅ What the Episode Does Not Claim
-
This introduction episode does not present definitive evidence that Brigitte Macron was born male, nor does it identify any corroborating sources or documentation.
-
It does not state accusations explicitly about incest, grooming, CIA programs, or other detailed conspiracy theories—those appear in subsequent episodes, not this introduction.
=====================================================
My follow up question: What are the 21 Simple Questions that Candace Owen wants answered?
The AI (ChatGPT) said that it could only find 14 questions that she was asking. These come from this episode.
1. Was the little girl in the alleged 1963 Communion photo the current First Lady?
2. Did Brigitte Macron ever use the name “Véronique”?
3. Can you account for all children in the Amiens family photograph and their whereabouts?
4. Did Brigitte Macron physically give birth to three children?
5. Is she the same person in the Oseillier wedding photograph?
6. Did Brigitte Macron ever have a relationship with “Véronique Dreux”?
7. Provide photographs of Brigitte in the 1970s.
8. Provide school photographs of Jean‑Michel Trogneux and Brigitte Trogneux, ideally together.
9. When did she first meet President Macron, and under what circumstances?
10. What were their respective ages when they met?
11. Did they have an intimate physical relationship before President Macron turned 18?
12. If so, at what age did that relationship begin?
13. Did the Macrons attempt to correct the French Wikipedia entry citing a 24‑year age difference (potentially implicating French statutory‑rape law Article 227‑27)?
14. Have they taken legal action against the “international child emancipation/pedophile lobby” for portraying their relationship as a positive example?
No comments:
Post a Comment