What does this mean? Maybe nothing. Or maybe a stock market crash is coming.
Wednesday, April 30, 2014
G30 up 1.60%
G30 as of 4/30/2014 | ||||||||
Shares (M) | Shares (M) | Price | Price | Total (M) | Total (M) | |||
Rank | Symbol | Company | 03/31/14 | 04/30/14 | 03/31/14 | 04/30/14 | 03/31/14 | 04/30/14 |
1 | AAPL | Apple Inc | 891.99 | 861.38 | 536.74 | 590.09 | 478,767 | 508,292 |
2 | XOM | Exxon Mobil | 4320 | 4320 | 97.68 | 102.41 | 421,978 | 442,411 |
3 | GOOG | 336.05 | 674.49 | 1,114.51 | 526.66 | 374,531 | 355,227 | |
4 | MSFT | Microsoft | 8300 | 8260 | 40.99 | 40.40 | 340,217 | 333,704 |
5 | BRK-A | Berkshire Hath | 1.65 | 1.65 | 187,350 | 193,275 | 309,128 | 318,904 |
6 | JNJ | Johnson Johnson | 2820 | 2830 | 98.23 | 101.29 | 277,009 | 286,651 |
7 | GE | General Electric | 10030 | 10040 | 25.89 | 26.89 | 259,677 | 269,976 |
8 | RDS-B | Royal Dutch Shell | 3150 | 3150 | 78.11 | 84.65 | 246,047 | 266,648 |
9 | WFC | Wells Fargo | 5260 | 5260 | 49.74 | 49.64 | 261,632 | 261,106 |
10 | WMT | Wal-Mart | 3230 | 3230 | 76.43 | 79.71 | 246,869 | 257,463 |
11 | NSRGY | Nestle | 3190 | 3190 | 75.22 | 77.18 | 239,952 | 246,204 |
12 | CVX | Chevron | 1910 | 1910 | 118.91 | 125.52 | 227,118 | 239,743 |
13 | PG | Proctor Gamble | 2710 | 2710 | 80.60 | 82.55 | 218,426 | 223,711 |
14 | JPM | JP Morgan Chase | 3760 | 3790 | 60.71 | 55.98 | 228,270 | 212,164 |
15 | NVS | Novartis | 2430 | 2430 | 85.02 | 86.94 | 206,599 | 211,264 |
16 | IBM | IBM | 1040 | 1040 | 192.49 | 196.47 | 200,190 | 204,329 |
17 | PFE | Pfizer | 6380 | 6380 | 32.12 | 31.28 | 204,926 | 199,566 |
18 | VZ | Verizon | 4140 | 4140 | 47.57 | 46.73 | 196,940 | 193,462 |
19 | HSBC | HSBC Holdings | 3750 | 3750 | 50.83 | 51.32 | 190,613 | 192,450 |
20 | BHP | BHP Billiton | 2660 | 2660 | 67.77 | 70.54 | 180,268 | 187,636 |
21 | T | ATT | 5210 | 5210 | 35.07 | 35.70 | 182,715 | 185,997 |
22 | ORCL | Oracle | 4460 | 4460 | 40.91 | 40.88 | 182,459 | 182,325 |
23 | KO | Coca Cola | 4410 | 4410 | 38.66 | 40.79 | 170,491 | 179,884 |
24 | MRK | Merck | 2940 | 2940 | 56.77 | 58.56 | 166,904 | 172,166 |
25 | BUD | Anheuser-Busch | 1610 | 1610 | 105.30 | 105.82 | 169,533 | 170,370 |
26 | SSNLF | Samsung | 130.92 | 130.92 | 1,220.00 | 1,300.00 | 159,722 | 170,196 |
27 | TOT | Total SA | 2270 | 2270 | 65.60 | 71.24 | 148,912 | 161,715 |
28 | BAC | Bank of America | 10570 | 10570 | 17.20 | 15.14 | 181,804 | 160,030 |
29 | BP | BP plc | 3100 | 3100 | 48.10 | 50.62 | 149,110 | 156,922 |
30 | FB | 2550 | 2550 | 60.24 | 59.78 | 153,612 | 152,439 | |
31 | AMZN | Amazon | 459.26 | 459.26 | 336.36 | 304.13 | 154,477 | 139,675 |
7,128,891 | 7,242,630 | |||||||
1.60% |
AMZN falls off a cliff but I will leave it here another month to try to recover. Total is newly added to the list. Samsung data is screwy. The important thing is the month-to-month change.
======
Update: Now I am thinking that this should include Toyota, Hoffman-LaRoche and maybe Citigroup.
Top Cities #14
Influenced by 10 year estimated population growth rate. Compare to prior list.
1. Beijing (5) [45%]
2. Shanghai (1) [40%]
3. Sao Paolo (7) [13%]
4. Seoul/Incheon (3) [12%]
5. London (10) [12%]
6. Los Angeles (9) [8.5%]
7. New York (2) [5.5%]
8. Tokyo (6) [6%]
9. Chicago (4) [3%]
10. Guangzhou (14) [42%]
11. Moscow (13) [13%]
12. Bangkok (17) [35%]
13. Osaka (8) [1%]
14. Singapore (16) [25%]
15. Toronto (20) [15%]
16. Paris (11) [5.5%]
17. Hong Kong (12) [6%]
18. Shenzhen (21) [45%]
19. Jakarta (22) [35%]
20. San Francisco (15) [12%]
21. Kuala Lumpur (25) [30%]
22. Istanbul (27) [25%]
23. Mexico City (18) [13%]
24. Washington (19) [13.5%]
25. Manila/Makati (29) [25%]
26. Mumbai (26) [19%]
27. Delhi (32) [39%]
28. Taipei (23) [5.5%]
29. Buenos Aires (24) [13%]
30. Dubai (33) [31%]
31. Mecca, Saudi Arabia (35) [30%]
32. Lagos, Nigeria (new) [45%]
33. Sydney (28) [16.5%]
34. Dhaka, Bangladesh (new) [37%]
35. Dallas (30) [18%]
36. Boston (31) [6%]
37. Kinshasa (new) [35%]
38. Tianjin (new) [34%]
39. Milan (34) [8%]
40. Dongguan (new) [27.5%]
Busan falls off
1. Beijing (5) [45%]
2. Shanghai (1) [40%]
3. Sao Paolo (7) [13%]
4. Seoul/Incheon (3) [12%]
5. London (10) [12%]
6. Los Angeles (9) [8.5%]
7. New York (2) [5.5%]
8. Tokyo (6) [6%]
9. Chicago (4) [3%]
10. Guangzhou (14) [42%]
11. Moscow (13) [13%]
12. Bangkok (17) [35%]
13. Osaka (8) [1%]
14. Singapore (16) [25%]
15. Toronto (20) [15%]
16. Paris (11) [5.5%]
17. Hong Kong (12) [6%]
18. Shenzhen (21) [45%]
19. Jakarta (22) [35%]
20. San Francisco (15) [12%]
21. Kuala Lumpur (25) [30%]
22. Istanbul (27) [25%]
23. Mexico City (18) [13%]
24. Washington (19) [13.5%]
25. Manila/Makati (29) [25%]
26. Mumbai (26) [19%]
27. Delhi (32) [39%]
28. Taipei (23) [5.5%]
29. Buenos Aires (24) [13%]
30. Dubai (33) [31%]
31. Mecca, Saudi Arabia (35) [30%]
32. Lagos, Nigeria (new) [45%]
33. Sydney (28) [16.5%]
34. Dhaka, Bangladesh (new) [37%]
35. Dallas (30) [18%]
36. Boston (31) [6%]
37. Kinshasa (new) [35%]
38. Tianjin (new) [34%]
39. Milan (34) [8%]
40. Dongguan (new) [27.5%]
Busan falls off
Top Cities #13
Influenced by the list of the tallest buildings in the world, and the skyline rating. Compare to the previous list. I think this is the first time Shanghai has ever been ranked #1.
1. Shanghai (2)
2. New York (3)
3. Seoul/Incheon (5)
4. Chicago (9)
5. Beijing (8)
6. Tokyo (1)
7. Sao Paolo (11)
8. Osaka (12)
9. Los Angeles (4)
10. London (7)
11. Paris (6)
12. Hong Kong (16)
13. Moscow (15)
14. Guangzhou (18)
15. San Francisco (10)
16. Singapore (21)
17. Bangkok (20)
18. Mexico City (13)
19. Washington (14)
20. Toronto (24)
21. Shenzhen (25)
22. Jakarta (17)
23. Taipei (28)
24. Buenos Aires (19)
25. Kuala Lumpur (30)
26. Mumbai (22)
27. Istanbul (23)
28. Sydney (26)
29. Manila/Makati (31)
30. Dallas (35)
31. Boston (36)
32. Delhi (27)
33. Dubai (new)
34. Milan (29)
35. Mecca, Saudi Arabia (new). The Makkah Royal Clock Tower is the 3rd tallest in the world.
36. Busan, South Korea (new). 13th best skyline in the world.
Cairo, Dhaka and Barcelona fall off.
1. Shanghai (2)
2. New York (3)
3. Seoul/Incheon (5)
4. Chicago (9)
5. Beijing (8)
6. Tokyo (1)
7. Sao Paolo (11)
8. Osaka (12)
9. Los Angeles (4)
10. London (7)
11. Paris (6)
12. Hong Kong (16)
13. Moscow (15)
14. Guangzhou (18)
15. San Francisco (10)
16. Singapore (21)
17. Bangkok (20)
18. Mexico City (13)
19. Washington (14)
20. Toronto (24)
21. Shenzhen (25)
22. Jakarta (17)
23. Taipei (28)
24. Buenos Aires (19)
25. Kuala Lumpur (30)
26. Mumbai (22)
27. Istanbul (23)
28. Sydney (26)
29. Manila/Makati (31)
30. Dallas (35)
31. Boston (36)
32. Delhi (27)
33. Dubai (new)
34. Milan (29)
35. Mecca, Saudi Arabia (new). The Makkah Royal Clock Tower is the 3rd tallest in the world.
36. Busan, South Korea (new). 13th best skyline in the world.
Cairo, Dhaka and Barcelona fall off.
The World of Tomorrow
The 1939 World's Fair opened on April 30, 1939 in Queens, NY. The whole vision of the future that it puts forth I find kind of strange, kind of like Brasilia, with the giant sphere. The "Court of States" may have had some influence on the United Nations being based in NY. (Indeed, the UN was first located there before moving to its permanent headquarters.) Television was introduced there. The interstate highway system was showcased. And superman. And last, but not least, Tomorrowland at Disneyland.
Tuesday, April 29, 2014
Apple Fail
Apple has made a lot of money charging premium prices for their iphones, but competitors are rapidly catching up, and Apple doesn't have anything else similar in the pipeline. It is running out of cash. It only has $18 billion left, down from $42.9 bn in December 2012. But no worries, it is selling $17 billion of bonds to replenish its coffers. And it won't be the last - "we fully expect that the company will have to access the debt capital markets at least once more, and maybe twice, in the next 12 months to maintain its domestic cash balance at minimum safe levels."
Where is the money going? To manipulate the stock price. They are buying back stock. (They are also doing a 7 for 1 stock split to lower the price).
What about the hoard of cash overseas? It is worthless. It can't be spent, without incurring a massive tax bill.
How long can this situation last? Until interest rates rise.
======================
And AAPL reaches an all-time high of 594.09 on Apr 28, and down just slightly lower at 592.33 on Apr 29. The only place for the stock to go is up. For now.
Where is the money going? To manipulate the stock price. They are buying back stock. (They are also doing a 7 for 1 stock split to lower the price).
What about the hoard of cash overseas? It is worthless. It can't be spent, without incurring a massive tax bill.
How long can this situation last? Until interest rates rise.
======================
And AAPL reaches an all-time high of 594.09 on Apr 28, and down just slightly lower at 592.33 on Apr 29. The only place for the stock to go is up. For now.
Friday, April 25, 2014
Top Cities #12
Based solely on population. Cities can only change 5 places from the previous list. Karachi is excluded as unliveable.
1. Tokyo (3)
2. Shanghai (7)
3. New York (1)
4. Los Angeles (8)
5. Seoul (10)
6. Paris (6)
7. London (2)
8. Beijing (13)
9. Chicago (4)
10. San Francisco (5)
11. Sao Paolo (14)
12. Osaka (17)
13. Mexico City (18)
14. Washington (9)
15. Moscow (12)
16. Hong Kong (11)
17. Jakarta (22)
18. Guangzhou-Foshan (23)
19. Buenos Aires (15)
20. Bangkok (25)
21. Singapore (16)
22. Mumbai (27)
23. Istanbul (20)
24. Toronto (19)
25. Shenzhen (28)
26. Sydney (21)
27. Delhi (31)
28. Taipei (26)
29. Milan (24)
30. Kuala Lumpur (32)
31. Manila (new)
32. Cairo (new)
33. Dhaka (new)
34. Barcelona (29)
35. Dallas (30)
36. Boston (35)
Zurich and Vienna fall off.
1. Tokyo (3)
2. Shanghai (7)
3. New York (1)
4. Los Angeles (8)
5. Seoul (10)
6. Paris (6)
7. London (2)
8. Beijing (13)
9. Chicago (4)
10. San Francisco (5)
11. Sao Paolo (14)
12. Osaka (17)
13. Mexico City (18)
14. Washington (9)
15. Moscow (12)
16. Hong Kong (11)
17. Jakarta (22)
18. Guangzhou-Foshan (23)
19. Buenos Aires (15)
20. Bangkok (25)
21. Singapore (16)
22. Mumbai (27)
23. Istanbul (20)
24. Toronto (19)
25. Shenzhen (28)
26. Sydney (21)
27. Delhi (31)
28. Taipei (26)
29. Milan (24)
30. Kuala Lumpur (32)
31. Manila (new)
32. Cairo (new)
33. Dhaka (new)
34. Barcelona (29)
35. Dallas (30)
36. Boston (35)
Zurich and Vienna fall off.
Wednesday, April 23, 2014
Top Cities #11
New list, influenced by number of English-speaking college graduates. The estimates are in brackets. See previous list.
- New York (6) [7000]
- London (2) [3850]
- Tokyo (4) [3750]
- Chicago (3) [3100]
- San Francisco/San Jose (5) [2300]
- Paris (1) [2050]
- Shanghai (10) [1400]
- Los Angeles (13) [4100]
- Washington (14) [1900]
- Seoul (7) [1300]
- Hong Kong (9) [1050]
- Moscow (17) [2144]
- Beijing (8) [950]
- Sao Paolo (18) [2050]
- Buenos Aires (15) [1300]
- Singapore (11) [500]
- Osaka (12) [900]
- Mexico City (19) [1200]
- Toronto (24) [3250]
- Istanbul (16) [850]
- Sydney (26) [2000]
- Jakarta (23) [1400]
- Guangzhou (25) [1100]
- Milan (21) [700]
- Bangkok (20) [420]
- Taipei (22) [550]
- Mumbai (32) [3000]
- Shenzhen (33) [800]
- Barcelona (30) [700]
- Dallas (35) [1900]
- Delhi (new) [2200]
- Kuala Lumpur (27) [300]
- Zurich (28) [500]
- Vienna (29) [520]
- Boston (new) [1950]
Monday, April 21, 2014
Ponzi point vs Keynesian end game
"Restoring fiscal discipline at the Ponzi point would cause the economy to break down for an unusually long period, failing to create jobs or growth. The ultimate threshold – call it the Keynesian end game – is when investors refuse to lend more money, forcing the government to either default or start hyperinflating (probably with some wealth confiscation added in). The difference between the Ponzi point and the end game is important. At the Ponzi point, the game isn’t over just yet, but it’s a foregone if not widely-recognized conclusion that you’re on a path in that direction. The path is firmly established because serious action to reign in deficits would wreak havoc on the economy and change the political calculus about austerity."
http://www.cyniconomics.com/2013/10/17/fonzie-or-ponzi-one-theory-on-the-limits-to-government-debt/
Commentary: So at the Ponzi point, the collapse is certain even if it hasn't happened yet. So when will the Ponzi point occur? The article says about 150% of debt to GDP. Right now the US national debt (excluding intragovernmental liabilities) is about 75% of GDP ($12.5 bn to $16.5 bn). So it could roughly double before we reach that point.
With the current projections, it doesn't look like this will happen any time soon. But the standard cure for a recession is a flood of deficit spending. The next recession (scheduled to start in October 2015 according to Martin Armstrong) will push us much closer to the danger point.
http://www.cyniconomics.com/2013/10/17/fonzie-or-ponzi-one-theory-on-the-limits-to-government-debt/
Commentary: So at the Ponzi point, the collapse is certain even if it hasn't happened yet. So when will the Ponzi point occur? The article says about 150% of debt to GDP. Right now the US national debt (excluding intragovernmental liabilities) is about 75% of GDP ($12.5 bn to $16.5 bn). So it could roughly double before we reach that point.
With the current projections, it doesn't look like this will happen any time soon. But the standard cure for a recession is a flood of deficit spending. The next recession (scheduled to start in October 2015 according to Martin Armstrong) will push us much closer to the danger point.
Friday, April 18, 2014
Monday, April 14, 2014
The trillion dollar bailout of Wells Fargo
I just noticed this today. Wells Fargo has over $1 trillion in short-term (less than 1 year) liabilities, for which it pays 0% interest. When the debts mature, they are just rolled over.
No one else seems to have noticed this phenomenon or cares about it. Obviously it is a government agency, because anyone else could get at least a minimal amount of interest. If I can find out anything else about it I will post it.
===========
Update: I can't find anything else about this. It appears to be a mistake.
No one else seems to have noticed this phenomenon or cares about it. Obviously it is a government agency, because anyone else could get at least a minimal amount of interest. If I can find out anything else about it I will post it.
===========
Update: I can't find anything else about this. It appears to be a mistake.
TBTF Bond Fund
Here is my chart of the too-big-to-fail corporate bonds, with only 4 on the list. There aren't really that many companies that have more than $100 billion in bonds and are at least A rated. I have excluded Bank of America [BAC] ($204.3 bn), Verizon [VZ] ($283.5 bn), Goldman Sachs [GS] ($481.5 bn), and Morgan Stanley [MS] ($508.2 bn) because they are BBB rated. Also AIG has $88.4 bn and Capital One (COF) has $85 bn.
I will think about this some more. Somehow I suspect that if Goldman Sachs were facing problems, they would be bailed out. The numbers for Verizon are screwy, but I think the rest of these could be in a bond fund of more than $3 trillion.
WFC | Wells Fargo | $1,411,445.30 |
C | Citigroup | $682,108.20 |
JPM | JP Morgan Chase | $440,582.10 |
GE | General Electric | $188,809.60 |
$2,722,945.20 |
I will think about this some more. Somehow I suspect that if Goldman Sachs were facing problems, they would be bailed out. The numbers for Verizon are screwy, but I think the rest of these could be in a bond fund of more than $3 trillion.
GE Debt
GE has issued almost $200 billion of bonds. Here is a chart:
Source: http://quicktake.morningstar.com/stocknet/bonds.aspx?symbol=ge
I find this interesting for the following reasons. I don't really care about GE in particular. But it is rated AA+ by SP, and I think it is considered too-big-to-fail (TBTF). I think that the Fed, if it were so inclined, might decide to purchase some of these bonds as collateral for its QE. I think that these might be considered part of an expanded money supply. I will look for similar cases. The criteria are: 1) A+ rated or higher, and 2) $100 billion or more of debt. Verizon debt doesn't qualify because it is basically junk.
GE Bonds | ||||
Series Name | Maturity | Amount $mil | Price | Coupon% |
Ge Cap Europea 4.625% | 07/04/14 | 1,033.7 | 104.5 | 4.625 |
Ge Scf 3.75% | 07/22/14 | 1,378.2 | 102.1 | 3.750 |
Ge Cap Europea | 07/28/14 | 1,378.2 | 98.6 | 0.500 |
Gen Elec Cap 4% | 10/15/14 | 417.6 | 100.9 | 4.000 |
Ge Cap Cda Fdg Co Mtn Cds- 5.28% | 10/22/14 | 271.8 | --- | 5.280 |
Ge Cap Europea 2.875% | 10/28/14 | 1,722.8 | 100 | 2.875 |
Ge Cap Sukuk L 3.875% | 11/26/14 | 500.0 | 101.6 | 3.875 |
Ge Cap Uk Fd 5.625% | 12/12/14 | 416.8 | 107.6 | 5.625 |
Gen Elec Cap 2% | 01/15/15 | 509.4 | 101.4 | 2.000 |
Ge Cap Cda Fdg Co Mtn Cds- 4.65% | 02/11/15 | 543.6 | --- | 4.650 |
Gen Elec Cap | 03/03/15 | 5,024.2 | 99.3 | 1.310 |
Ge Cap Uk Fd 5.125% | 03/03/15 | 833.6 | 109.2 | 5.125 |
Ge Cap Europea 5.25% | 05/18/15 | 2,756.5 | 100 | 5.250 |
Ge Cap Europea 2.875% | 09/17/15 | 2,067.4 | 100 | 2.875 |
Gen Elec Cap 3.875% | 09/21/15 | 331.6 | 103.7 | 3.875 |
Ge Cap Europea 0.544% | 09/25/15 | 13,782.5 | --- | 0.565 |
General Elec 0.85% | 10/09/15 | 2,000.0 | 100.2 | 0.850 |
Ge Cap Europea 1.25% | 10/15/15 | 1,378.2 | 101 | 1.250 |
Ge Cap Uk Fd 4.625% | 01/18/16 | 583.5 | 105.6 | 4.625 |
Ge Cap Europea | 02/22/16 | 1,860.6 | 100 | 0.436 |
Ge Cap Europea 3.75% | 04/04/16 | 1,722.8 | 100 | 3.750 |
Gen Elec Cap 4.875% | 04/05/16 | 385.6 | 106.7 | 4.875 |
Ge Cap Uk Fd | 05/09/16 | 1,000.3 | 99.6 | 1.071 |
Ge Cap Cda Fdg Co Mtn Cds- 5.1% | 06/01/16 | 362.4 | --- | 5.100 |
Ge Cap European Funding, Dublin | 06/20/16 | 10,000.0 | --- | 0.435 |
Ge Cap Bk Inc Retail | 08/24/16 | 2,000.0 | --- | 1.350 |
Ge Cap Europea 4.125% | 10/27/16 | 2,067.4 | 100 | 4.125 |
Gen Elec Cap 1.299% | 11/25/16 | 580.7 | --- | 1.299 |
Gen Elec Cap 2.25% | 12/19/16 | 707.5 | 105 | 2.250 |
Ge Cap Cda Fdg Co Mtn Cds- 4.55% | 01/17/17 | 498.3 | --- | 4.550 |
Ge Cap Europea 4.25% | 03/01/17 | 2,067.4 | 109.4 | 4.250 |
Ge Cap Retail Bk Draper Utah | 03/07/17 | 2,000.0 | --- | 1.050 |
Ge Commrcl Ln 1.70688% | 04/19/17 | 8,075.3 | --- | 1.707 |
Ge Cap Europea 3.625% | 06/15/17 | 634.0 | 107.8 | 3.625 |
Ge Cap Europea | 06/15/17 | 606.4 | 101.1 | 1.214 |
Ge Cap Cda Fdg Co Mtn Cds- 5.53% | 08/17/17 | 588.9 | --- | 5.530 |
Ge Cap Uk Fd 4.125% | 09/28/17 | 1,000.3 | 107.1 | 4.125 |
Gen Elec Cap 1.625% | 10/19/17 | 566.0 | 104.2 | 1.625 |
Ge Cap Ccmt 2009-4 3.8% | 11/15/17 | 475.0 | --- | 3.800 |
General Elec 5.25% | 12/06/17 | 4,000.0 | 112.8 | 5.250 |
Ge Cap Ccmt 2012-1 1.03% | 01/15/18 | 750.0 | --- | 1.030 |
Ge Cap Europea 5.375% | 01/16/18 | 1,722.8 | 100 | 5.375 |
Gen Elec Cap 4.25% | 01/17/18 | 520.6 | 99.5 | 4.250 |
Ge Corp Aircraft F 0.6125% | 01/25/18 | 2,872.1 | --- | 0.613 |
Ge Cap Cda Fdg Co Mtn Cds- 4.4% | 02/08/18 | 362.4 | --- | 4.400 |
Ge Cap Retail Bk Draper Utah | 03/07/18 | 2,000.0 | --- | 1.500 |
Ge Cap Europea 1.625% | 03/15/18 | 1,378.2 | 101.6 | 1.625 |
Ge Cap Ccmt 2010-1 3.69% | 03/15/18 | 500.0 | --- | 3.690 |
Gen Elec Cap 8.5% | 04/06/18 | 24,906.6 | 112.2 | 8.500 |
Gen Elec Cap 5.15% | 04/25/18 | 3,522.7 | --- | 5.150 |
Ge Cap Cda Fdg Co Mtn Cds- 2.42% | 05/31/18 | 906.0 | --- | 2.420 |
Ge Cap Ccmt 2012-5 0.95% | 06/15/18 | 600.0 | --- | 0.950 |
Ge Cap Ccmt 2012-4 | 06/15/18 | 350.0 | --- | 0.544 |
Ge Cap Europea 0.728% | 08/08/18 | 13,782.5 | --- | 0.728 |
Ge Cap Europea 6% | 01/15/19 | 1,378.2 | 100 | 6.000 |
Ge Cap Retail Bk Draper Utah | 03/07/19 | 2,000.0 | --- | 1.950 |
Ge Cap Uk Fd 5.625% | 04/25/19 | 500.1 | 114.3 | 5.625 |
Ge Cap Ccmt 2011-2 CMO | 05/15/19 | 650.0 | --- | 0.681 |
Ge Cap Cda Fdg Co Mtn Cds- 3.55% | 06/11/19 | 317.1 | --- | 3.550 |
Ge Cap Bk Inc Retail | 07/02/19 | 500.0 | --- | 4.000 |
Ge Cap Uk Fd 4.375% | 07/31/19 | 1,042.0 | 108.5 | 4.375 |
Ge Cap Cda Fdg Co Mtn Cds- 5.68% | 09/10/19 | 634.2 | --- | 5.680 |
Gen Elec Cap 3.125% | 12/06/19 | 679.2 | 112.1 | 3.125 |
Ge Cap Europea 5.375% | 01/23/20 | 2,067.4 | 100 | 5.375 |
Ge Cap Retail Bk Draper Utah | 03/09/20 | 2,000.0 | --- | 2.300 |
Ge Cap Ccmt 2012-3 | 03/15/20 | 400.0 | --- | 0.000 |
Ge Cap Europea 2.25% | 07/20/20 | 1,378.2 | 100 | 2.250 |
Ge Cap Ccmt 2012-6 1.36% | 08/15/20 | 1,000.0 | --- | 1.360 |
Ge Cap Uk Fd 5.875% | 11/04/20 | 833.6 | 117.3 | 5.875 |
Ge Cap Retail Bk Draper Utah | 03/08/21 | 2,000.0 | --- | 2.650 |
Ge Cap Ccmt 2013-1 1.35% | 03/15/21 | 800.0 | --- | 1.350 |
Ge Cap Europea | 05/17/21 | 1,378.2 | 96.2 | 0.513 |
Ge Cap Retail Bk Draper Utah | 06/24/21 | 392.1 | --- | 3.250 |
Ge Cap Europea 4.35% | 11/03/21 | 758.0 | 115.8 | 4.350 |
Ge Cap Ccmt 2012-2 2.22% | 01/15/22 | 600.0 | --- | 2.220 |
Ge Cap Cda Fdg Co Mtn Cds- 4.6% | 01/26/22 | 679.5 | --- | 4.600 |
Ge Cap Ccmt 2012-7 1.76% | 09/15/22 | 500.0 | --- | 1.760 |
General Elec 2.7% | 10/09/22 | 3,000.0 | 98.3 | 2.700 |
Ge Cap Europea 2.625% | 03/15/23 | 1,378.2 | 102.9 | 2.625 |
Ge Cap Uk Fd 5.125% | 05/24/23 | 708.5 | 112.4 | 5.125 |
Ge Cap Uk Fd 4.125% | 09/13/23 | 916.9 | 104.8 | 4.125 |
Ge Cap Retail Bk Draper Utah | 03/07/24 | 2,000.0 | --- | 3.300 |
General Elec 3.375% | 03/11/24 | 750.0 | 101.6 | 3.375 |
Ge Cap Europea 4.625% | 02/22/27 | 826.9 | 100 | 4.625 |
Ge Busn Ln T 0.52585% | 05/15/32 | 10,082.5 | --- | 0.445 |
Ge Cap Europea 3.65% | 08/23/32 | 399.7 | --- | 3.650 |
Ge Cap Uk Fd 5.875% | 01/18/33 | 1,083.6 | 121.2 | 5.875 |
Ge Busn Ln Tr 2007-1 | 04/15/35 | 373.2 | --- | 0.000 |
Ge Busn Ln Tr 2007-1 | 04/15/35 | 373.2 | --- | 0.000 |
Ge Cap Cda Fdg Co Mtn Cds- 5.73% | 10/22/37 | 815.4 | --- | 5.730 |
Ge Cap Europea 6.025% | 03/01/38 | 895.9 | 100 | 6.025 |
Ge Cap Uk Fd 6.25% | 05/05/38 | 833.6 | 128.8 | 6.250 |
Ge Cap Comm Mortg 7.05% | 06/10/38 | 1,440.0 | --- | 7.050 |
Ge Cap Comm Mortg 7.05% | 06/10/38 | 1,200.0 | --- | 7.050 |
Ge Cap Uk Fd 8% | 01/14/39 | 1,083.6 | 152.7 | 8.000 |
General Elec 4.125% | 10/09/42 | 2,000.0 | 97.8 | 4.125 |
General Elec 4.5% | 03/11/44 | 2,250.0 | 102.6 | 4.500 |
Gen Elec Cap 5.5% | 09/15/66 | 488.4 | 105.1 | 5.500 |
Gen Elec Cap 4.625% | 09/15/66 | 306.7 | 104.1 | 4.625 |
Ge Cap Tr I | 11/15/67 | 813.1 | 110.8 | 6.375 |
$188,809.60 |
I find this interesting for the following reasons. I don't really care about GE in particular. But it is rated AA+ by SP, and I think it is considered too-big-to-fail (TBTF). I think that the Fed, if it were so inclined, might decide to purchase some of these bonds as collateral for its QE. I think that these might be considered part of an expanded money supply. I will look for similar cases. The criteria are: 1) A+ rated or higher, and 2) $100 billion or more of debt. Verizon debt doesn't qualify because it is basically junk.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)