Summary of Xavier Poussard’s Interview
-
Origin of the Rumor:
The controversy began with Natacha Rey, who was placed in police custody. A video with a clairvoyant [Amadine Roy] and later coverage by journalist Emmanuel Anison [Emmanuelle Anizon] helped push the rumor into mainstream attention. Anison wrote a book on the topic which, even though it concluded the rumor was false, still raised unsettling questions for the Macron couple.
-
Macron’s Public Reaction:
Emmanuel Macron himself spoke emotionally about the situation on French television, calling it one of his worst memories as president. This elevated the rumor into international news, since major agencies like AFP and Reuters picked it up, spreading it into the U.S. press (e.g., New York Post) and eventually to Candace Owens. -
Candace Owens’ Role:
Owens received a long legal letter from Macron’s lawyers, demanding she retract or face defamation charges. She responded by asking for simple evidence (e.g., family photos of Brigitte’s alleged brother Jean-Michel Trogneux). When no answers came, she turned the dispute into a video series (“Becoming Brigitte”), framing it as investigative infotainment. Each new legal response from Macron’s lawyers only fueled more publicity. -
Court Cases in France:
Brigitte Macron sued Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy. The appeals court, however, overturned earlier rulings, dismissing dozens of alleged defamatory passages—seen as a total victory for the defendants. Despite this, the Macrons pursued further appeals, prolonging the controversy. -
Public Relations “Backfire”:
Poussard argues the Macrons’ communications strategy amplified the rumor rather than suppressing it. Each official denial, lawsuit, or statement made the story grow internationally. He calls it a textbook case of “what not to do” in public relations, predicting it will be studied in communications schools. -
His Own Involvement:
Poussard says he is wrongly treated as an instigator of the rumor simply because he covered it in his paper-only magazine Faits & Documents. He insists he never spread it online (pointing out he only joined X/Twitter later), so cyberbullying charges against him make no sense. He criticizes the French justice system for devoting heavy police resources to trivial actions like tracing people who retweeted jokes. -
Legal Overreach and Absurdities:
He describes how prosecutors and police in Italy (where he resides) and France fail to understand the basis of the charges. He notes Brigitte Macron refused psychiatric evaluation, which would normally be required to prove psychological harm in a cyberharassment case. He finds it disturbing that vast state resources were mobilized to investigate ordinary citizens over retweets. -
Broader Point:
To Poussard, the whole affair shows both the fragility of the presidential couple under rumor pressure and the misuse of state and legal power. He frames it as a sign of unhealthy political overreach rather than a simple defamation case.
No comments:
Post a Comment